Can carbon dating faked
U-CRU Telegraph’s Booker on the “climategate” scandal “Climategate” surpasses “Global Warming” on Google Mann to be investigated by Penn State University review Understanding Climategate: Who’s Who – a video The Curry letter: a word about “deniers”… has run its course” IPCC reviewer: “don’t cover up the divergence” Mc Intyre: The deleted data from the “Hide the Decline” trick Climategate: Stuart Varney “lives with Ed” Climategate: Pielke Senior on the NCDC CCSP report – “strong arm tactics” Warwick Hughes shows how Jones selections put bias in Australian Temperatures Climategate: CATO’s Pat Michaels and Center for American Progress Dan Weiss on Fox News Quote of the week #23 – calls for resignation in Climategate Uh, oh – raw data in New Zealand tells a different story than the “official” one.
How “The Trick” was pulled off The Australian ETS vote: a political litmus test for cap and trade An open letter from Dr. Climategate: “Men behaving badly” – a short summary for laymen Statement on CRU hacking from the American Meteorological Society Climategate: hide the decline – codified Must see video – Climategate spoof from Minnesotans for Global Warming The people -vs- the CRU: Freedom of information, my okole…
Judith Curry on climate science Zorita calls for barring Phil Jones, Michael Mann, and Stefan Rahmstorf from further IPCC participation Climategate protester pwn3d CBC on live TV UEA Climate Scientist: “possible that…I. Government petition started in UK regarding CRU Climategate CEI Files Notice of Intent to Sue NASA GISS The appearance of hypocrisy at the NYT – Note to Andy Nov 24 Statement from UEA on the CRU files Nov 23 Statement from UEA on the CRU files Monbiot issues an unprecedented apology – calls for Jones resignation The CRUtape Letters™, an Alternative Explanation.
CRU Emails “may” be open to interpretation, but commented code by the programmer tells the real story Video: Dr.
In his lecture there, Horst Fuhrmann, president of the Monumenta Germaniae Historica, described how some documents forged by the Roman Catholic Church during the Middle Ages were created hundreds of years before their “great moments” arrived, after which they were embraced by medieval society.
This implied that whomever produced the forgeries must have skillfully anticipated the future…
or there was some discrepancy in calculating dates.
This would mean that all artifacts ascribed to those three centuries belong to other periods, and that all events thought to have occurred during that same period occurred at other times, or are outright fabrications.For instance, a man named It seems that historians are plagued by a plethora of falsified documents from the Middle Ages, and such was the subject of an archaeological conference in München, Germany in 1986.Tim Ball on the CRU emails Pielke Senior: Comment On The Post “Enemies Caught In Action!” On The Blackboard Bishop Hill’s compendium of CRU email issues Spencer on elitism in the IPCC climate machine CRU Emails – search engine now online Release of CRU files forges a new hockey stick reconstruction Mike’s Nature Trick and the post that started it all… Hans-Ulrich Niemitz introduces his paper on the “phantom time hypothesis,” he kindly asks his readers to be patient, benevolent, and open to radically new ideas, because his claims are highly unconventional.
Search for can carbon dating faked:
This is because his paper is suggesting three difficult-to-believe propositions: 1) Hundreds of years ago, our calendar was polluted with 297 years which never occurred; 2) this is not the year 2005, but rather 1708; and 3) The purveyors of this hypothesis are not crackpots.